• Peter Bateman
    273
    In the Jan/Feb edition of Safeguard magazine we pose three questions based on stories in the magazine. One of them is this:

    Lawrence Waterman now acknowledges H&S is 5% technical and 95% about people. If you agree, what specific experience taught you that lesson? If you disagree, why?

    Feel free to respond here on the Forum, or privately here via a Survey Monkey form.

    An edited selection of responses will be published in the Mar/Apr edition, but with no names attached. One randomly selected person will receive a prize, namely a copy of the book Paper Safe, by Greg Smith.
  • Peter Bateman
    273
    To place Lawrence's view in context, attached is his piece in Safeguard.
    Attachment
    SG185 Waterman (789K)
  • Peter Bateman
    273
    I sent Lawrence Waterman a link to this thread. He replied that his "crude comment" about 5% technical and 95% people was designed to stimulate thinking, and that the responses in the Forum "are much more thoughtful than my throwaway remark deserved".

    Nevertheless, he adds:

    "More mature and experienced practitioners, in general, do focus on the people they are working with, working for and seeking to influence - but the noise meter, the air sampling pump, the measuring tape, the spreadsheet are still sometimes deployed as barriers to hide behind, and to generate “comfort tasks”. I was suggesting that, however perplexing and critical the technical issues are, we need to remember what we are in safety and health for, and to never let the technical become a smokescreen behind which we fail to develop the crucial human relationships based on mutual respect that can sponsor and maintain real improvements in the workplace."
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to Safeguard Online!

Where people in New Zealand with health & safety duties find the information, innovation and inspiration they need.