Thanks Kevin, that is very helpful I'll take a look at that webinar. I'll also recommend that we have our policy checked by legal or specialists.
Much appreciated - have a safe and well week.

Thanks Keith - that's true, and it's interesting the reporting from the client / principal, was separating out non LTI incidents (though not illnesses) - the LTIs came under a category of 'serious harm' - which included notifiables. So they are keeping their eye on the higher impact events.
In this situation we are needing definitions so these particular sub-contractors are reporting to us in a standardised way - however they still need to be applicable and relevant for all of our clients/ org wide reporting.
Therefore I can't ask those questions to that audience... but they are good food for thought... while I still sweat some of the small things! Thanks again

Thanks for these answers guys, I also was looking for this info for our critical risk review analysis.

I've just redone ours, splitting them into HS and Wellbeing indicators. We've kept in the lag indicators for HS so we can track (notifiable events, injuries, employee and contractor incidents and SL hours), but adding in more lead around training events, uncontrolled hazards, safety observations, internal and external audits completed. For Wellbeing - lag is EAP sessions, lead is resilience training and ignite platform interactions. I'm introducing critical risk critical control verifications under internal audits also... slow and steady progress!!