• Old Safeguard Magazines
    Another free to a good home, not quite the collection Phillipa has accumulated, but:
    2015-152 July/Aug
    2015-153 Sept/Oct
    2015-154 Nov/Dec
    2016-155 Jan/Feb
    2016-156 Mar/Apr
    2016-157 May/Jun
    2016-158 July/Aug
    2016-159 Sept/Oct
    2016-160 Nov/Dec
    2017-161 Jan/Feb
    2017-162 Mar/Apr
    2017-163 May/Jun
    2017-164 Jul/Aug
    2017-165 Sept/Oct
    2017-166 Nov/Dec
    2018-167 Jan/Feb
    2018-168 Mar/Apr
    2018-169 May/Jun
    2018-170 Jul/Aug
    2018-171 Sept/Oct
    2018-172 Nov/Dec
    2019-173 Jan/Feb
    2019-174 Mar/Apr
    2019-175 May/Jun
    2019-176 Jul/Aug
    2019-177 Sept/Oct
    2019-178 Nov/Dec

    Pickup Lyttelton, if you want to cover the courier cost will sort that out for you, prefer to get rid of the lot in one go.
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    Doing that might also have some impacts out in the wide world too Sheri, wouldn't hurt to knock another 50-75 off the Road Toll, could help with drowning toll and other outdoor pursuits- I'm not a "cotton wool" fan, just a fan of looking at the risks involved and planing how to reduce them, and what self rescue is going to look like/require
  • Fair Pay Agreements - opportunity?
    If they were actually doing what they said they were doing/going to do, that might have been the case, but they weren't.
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    Didn't say eliminate Aaron, limit was the word used and it sounds like your company is doing all the right things to limit unfortunate events, unfortunately some aren't.

    Pre employment testing could reveal a predisposition to risky behavour, just as pre employment drug testing could indicate some risky extra curricular habits
  • Where can I study health and safety law?
    We ought not be doing what we do because the law says so.

    But I am stunned OP can be studying a Grad Dip and the law isn't mentioned at all in the course.
    Andrew

    Sadly, there are still dinosaurs out there who will ask "is there a legal requirement to do this or that", so personally I favour a prescriptive approach to a minimum standard, embellish all you want after achieving that..

    I look at it this way, the road rules could say, do a H&S assessment and then drive at the speed that your assessment tells you you will arrive safely- not really going to work is it (although in the absence of traffic enforcement, that is what happens frequently)
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    Yes we have considerably added to the possible pool of absolute numbers and the fact is, that is in effect trending down.
    What isn't trending down is the number of serious harm accidents, that has been constantly climbing over time- so we're not doing that well.

    Given that 33 of the 52 workplace deaths were 'vehicle accidents' there is a sizeable overlap.

    It's also interesting to think about the fact that this is where a moments inattention, or other human failings can have drastic consequences. While we can endeavor to train, and make people aware of these, it does little to stop basic mistakes.
    Aaron Marshall
    Would be interesting to break those down into those caused by Driver Fatigue, Mechanical Failure, Substance Abuse, Driver Distraction via cell phone- those we could do something about, and there is of course the "stupid" factor that we can only limit by through pre employment vetting. That will be tough in the current era of plenty of work vs a lack of workers to do that work.
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    the concept of killing workers cannot be a discussion because the outcome of the investigation may highlight some other reasoning for the fatality.Don Ramsay

    Not intended to be a discussion on the concept of workers dying or getting seriously injured in a given workplace accident Don. more a question of what is it going to take to see these statistics trending down?

    I have my views about what's required, but I'd like to draw out some other opinions. Of course, for specific deaths/accidents, there will be specific issues involved, but broadly/generally, what is it going to take to see the trends heading downward. While I agree with the Andrews, that some accidents are caused by "stupid" saying we're at an irreducible minimum now, seems wrong to me.
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    That is an interesting perspective on port operations, and inter-company lines of control Sheri.

    So, your theory is, let's just accept that every year 50-60 people are going to trundle off to work,and not come home, they are just collateral damage, the cost of doing business and most likely they brought it on themselves- as you say no one can fix stupid

    Anyone else think the same, or do you think there are some stones left unturned?
    Steve H

    Missing the point people, talking about what needs to happen to reduce the workplace death rate this country has, which hasn't changed appreciably in the last twenty plus years. We had a change of H&S legislation following Pike River, a new H&S Regulator- from my perspective, nothing has changed.

    It is the culture of the workers that has to change.Andrew P

    Possibly, because at the end of the day we have over-engineered solutions so individuals no longer think. Or they lack motivation to be responsible for their own actions. They are perhaps lazy and just sit back and rely on all the safety devices around them.

    Or really. It might be because we cant fix stupid. (without bankrupting ourselves in the process)
    Andrew

    The Andrews lay the blame for the fifty to sixty workplace deaths on the workers involved (or are you singling out just port workers guys?). Certainly some workplace deaths may be due to Darwin's Laws Of Natural Selection in operation, but surly it's drawing a long bow to infer they all are, and what about the rising number of serious harm accidents in workplaces?[Remembering that I am talking all workplaces, not just Ports]
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    Perhaps we are in "the last mile"

    You know. where you put reasonable resources into something and you get 90% there. But to extract that last 10% is extremely difficult and the return on investment may not be there.
    Andrew

    We've been a long time in that last mile Andrew, and for the record, I am talking about workplace deaths and serious accidents generally, the latest one (that I am aware of), just happened to be a port worker. Doesn't really matter what the workplace was, dead is dead whatever way you slice and dice it.

    So, your theory is, let's just accept that every year 50-60 people are going to trundle off to work,and not come home, they are just collateral damage, the cost of doing business and most likely they brought it on themselves- as you say no one can fix stupid

    Anyone else think the same, or do you think there are some stones left unturned?
  • Why Are We Still Killing Our Workers?
    Workers per annum, each year on average 50-60 workers die in a workplace accident
    Its a bit early to say "we are killing our workers". No doubt in the fullness of time there will be an enquiry and causes of death will be determined.Andrew
    We had one following Pike River, out with the old and we'll setup this new model.

    It's had enough time to bed in, at least a tiny bit- it hasn't changed the average number of deaths per year, the only thing that's changed is the the number of serious accidents, that's trending up.
    So my question/challenge is, what does it take to change this?
    .
    Arguably,hell it's only 50-60 deaths per year, back in the bad old days, we managed to take out 20-30 people on a holiday weekend, but after 1973 enough was enough. We spent money on better roads, we trained drivers a little better, we started to be able to buy safer cars. We spent money on advertising about the dangers of drunk driving. We started to use speed cameras and red light cameras to encourage safer driving.

    All of these things, despite a doubling(almost) of the population, more and more vehicles using the roads, have meant that you have a greater chance of making it home alive after a holiday weekend road trip now, than you did in the early 1970's.

    So why can't we replicate this success in the workplace?
  • Work Should Not Hurt
    True Chris, spent a bit of time on building sites and seen lot's of guys worn out and broken before they are particularly old.The resources that you've linked to are a start, but lots of conversation needs to be had about doing things smarter, rather than handraulically.

    The points about van layout are well made, while we were roaming around testing and tagging, about 30% of our workload included tradies and their gear in vans and site huts- the better laid out ones were a joy to do, the dump and run brigade, yeah nah, no so much.
  • Orange and Contact Tracing
    There's a bunch of redundant legislation on the books, unenforced,and gathering dust. But I agree, this should be tidied up.Hopefully,we now have a play book for the next time this happens.
  • Orange and Contact Tracing
    And yet those legal requirements continue to prevail even if Orange level guidance seems to make no mention of itAndy Bunyan

    Think there would be a real mutiny if that were pushed Andy, contact tracing ceased to be relevant when the eradication policy ended.
  • Lithium Batteries - Little Lucifiers?
    Fitbit Ionic Smartwatch
    The Hazard

    Fitbit has determined that there is a risk that, in rare circumstances, the battery in the Ionic Smartwatch may overheat.

    If the battery overheats while a user is wearing the product and the user does not remove the watch, it could present a burn hazard.

    What to do

    Stop using the Ionic Smartwatch and visit help.fitbit.com/ionic to organise a refund.

    Customers will be issued a refund of USD299 and an access code for a discount of 40% off select new products from the Fitbit Store.

    This recall does not affect any other Fitbit smartwatches or trackers
    NZ Rcalls
  • Storing or Transporting Lithium Batteries?
    The latest Electron Issue 113 has this advice for electricians installing EV Chargers, if you are thinking of getting a fast charger installed, or one that charges a larger EVs battery, there may be some extra cost involved.

    Installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment

    The increasing use of Electric Vehicles (EVs), and the demand for higher charging rates, is placing demands on existing installations, especially domestic installations.

    Before installing an EV charger, it is important to check the charger’s specifications to ensure that the charger is designed to operate from NZ supplies of 230 or 400 volts.

    When installing an EV charger (EVSE), especially where the charger requires more than 15 A, it is important for the installing Electrician to ensure that the incoming mains will not be overloaded. It is not acceptable for the loading of an installation to be controlled through the consumer making decisions to turn equipment on and off.

    Equally, it is necessary to reassess both the maximum demand, and the maximum volt drop of the installation to ensure that electrical appliances are supplied with electricity within their safe operating voltage. Excessive volt drop may be a sign that the installation wiring will not tolerate a high load for prolonged periods. It may also result in appliance fires, or failures of Residual Current Devices (RCDs) to operate correctly, noting that many EV chargers contain safety function equipment such as RCDs.

    In some cases, “smart” technology will be needed to moderate the charging rate of the charger, or for the supply mains to be upgraded.

    It is recommended that any permanently connected EV charger is supplied through a dedicated subcircuit from the installation’s main switchboard that is rated for the anticipated load.

    EV chargers are declared medium-risk articles requiring them to be covered by a supplier declaration of conformity (SDoC). It is good practice for installers to obtain a copy of the SDoC and attach this to their CoC for the installation.
    Electrical Workers Registration Board
  • Storing or Transporting Lithium Batteries?
    The first question would be Tony, what capacity Lithium battery are you thinking of? And what sort of workplace?
    For a small capacity Lithium battery, phone, laptop, power tool etc, knock it down with with a Dry Powder ABC Extinguisher, Wrap in a fire blanket and get it outside away from any other flammable material- bearing in mind that the fumes given off by these fires are extremely toxic.

    Bigger capacity Lithium Battery fires are the province of trained fire fighters, with full Self Contained Breathing apparatus, and lots of water. The Aerosol extinguishing technology that I posted a link to above, looks to be a cost effective way of containing a battery fire. For a workshop situation, EV recharging bay, EV Replacement Battery storage area, that would have to merit serious consideration as a means of limiting the spread of such a fire until the fire brigade can get onsite and deal to it.
  • Storing or Transporting Lithium Batteries?
    The above technologies will need to be considered by shipping lines and used EV importers in the light of Shipping giant MOL confirms it has stopped carrying used EVs over safety concerns
  • Ventilation Of Workplaces : Rethinking breathing: How to end the pandemic
    Is the important difference between ventilation (used air is deposited outside and new air comes into the system) versus re circulation (used air is reused)?Peter Beaver

    Yes, I think that is the crux of it Peter, although for a belt and braces approach, I would look at UV Technology also.
  • Do you take it personally?
    We the country accepted poor legislation, and an underfunded regulatorChris Peace

    With no change in the number of workplace deaths, and an increasing serious injury rate Chris, from my jaundiced eye, I don't see any improvement, improving legislation is all very well,but only if it's combined with education and enforcement.

    But I agree with you,Michael you are clearly doing things that are working, are you working on a paper (or three) and a book, because there have to be somethings that you do,that will work in other workplaces.

    And grumpy bugger that i am, I want to see the workplace death rate trending down, in a similar fashion to the road toll, which has halved in the last 40 years
  • Are you drowning in paperwork?
    An example that comes to mind is the common requirement for periodic refresher training, with little understanding of key principles of learning and development. Firstly, training is only an input; the key point is for people to be competent, not just 'trained'.Sheri Greenwell

    Frequently, this is driven by Industry Training Organizations, in part for very laudable reasons, but hey if we get to clip the ticket over and over again, what a great business model.

    But I agree with your assessment that we are locked into a paradigm of last century bureaucracy, in part this may be driven by the belief that "the bigger my book is, and the more boxes there are to tick" the better and more effectively I've done my job.