A post on this thread has been removed because it did not meet the behaviour standards outlined in the Forum guidelines.

At this point it may be useful for contributors to this thread to refer to the Forum guidelines.

I'll summarise here once the magazine is in the hands of subscribers, which should be Thursday.

This was one of the first posts on the Forum some years ago. I'm highlighting it to encourage recent Forum members to introduce themselves on this thread, and/or to post a new thread asking for help over some aspect of H&S which they are grappling with.

This thread is now closed. There are many online forums available to debate the merits of vaccines. This isn't one of them.

Good to see people responding to Fiona's request.

Regarding responses in general, another way to do it is to send someone a private message within the Forum.

Just click on the person, then select "Start a conversation".

These "conversation" direct messages are private. No one else - not even the forum administrator - can see them.

OK, time to wrap it up. Rebecca - many thanks for making yourself available to the Forum and for your thoughtful responses to some really good questions.
For those Forum members who haven't yet read Rebecca's book, get the details here.

Keep those questions coming, folks! They all go to a moderation queue for release.

Start thinking of questions you'd like to put to Rebecca for Monday's session, and enter them into this thread.
As always with this Q&A format, all questions & answers to this particular thread go into a queue for the moderator to release in a timely fashion. The first question will be released about an hour before things kick off at 10am.

Hasn't happened yet - next Monday! Click on "I'm attending" to get a reminder.
As with previous Q&A sessions, they are all text-based and available for reading later.

Thanks Grant. If you wish to respond to his questions above, or to ask one of your own, please do so.

Responses will enter the queue for moderation and potential release to the Forum on Friday morning before the session starts.

Not all responses will necessarily be released to the Forum, depending on the volume of questions, any repetition of the same question, etc.

OK, it's nearing 10 so time to post your responses to the questions above, and to tell of your experience grappling with the mental health side of things.

One last question coming up before we let Craig go ...

I have tweaked the Forum's settings so that, from now on, all questions for Craig's session tomorrow will come to me privately for consideration. So I can release them one at a time during the chat session.

So ... fire away! What queries about H&S strategy do you have?

Good move. We live in uncertain times and no one has all the answers, let alone all the best questions. Self-doubt is our friend. [End of philosophical statement.]

This post is deliberately inflammatory. People who wish to comment on Massey University's decision are free to do so elsewhere in the many other more appropriate online forums.

This thread is now closed.

FYI, a new category for posts has been created, called: Environment: the 'E' in 'HSE'
Also a new category for H&S reps, so by all means encourage your reps to join the Forum.

I don't think there were any 'participants' as such. That is, the study was entirely data-based. No one was interviewed.

Looks like you can't change your name yourself (I just tried wearing my @Peter Bateman hat). However as administrator I can change member names.

I have changed the Forum's settings so that members may now edit their own posts up to one day afterwards. (Previously, members could edit their posts only up to ten minutes after posting.)

To edit your own post, revisit the post and hover over the three dots, which should give you a pencil logo - that's the edit option.